Noninvasive Fetal Aneuploidy Detection for Trisomy 21, 13, and 18

By Cassidy Possehl
Published: 2017-04-06
Keywords: Noninvasive fetal aneuploidy detection
Noninvasive Fetal Aneuploidy Detection for Trisomy 21, 13, and 18

Noninvasive fetal aneuploidy detection technology allows for the detection of fetal genetic conditions, specifically having three chromosomes, a condition called aneuploidy, by analyzing a simple blood sample from the pregnant woman. Dennis Lo and Rossa Chiu researched methods of detection of aneuploidies in the early twenty-first century. Their research has been specifically applied to three trisomies, trisomy twenty-one known as Down syndrome, trisomy eighteen known as Edwards Syndrome, and trisomy thirteen known as Patau Syndrome. Prior to the ability to detect fetal DNA in a pregnant woman’s blood, physicians performed amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling, two techniques that increase the risk of spontaneous abortion. Noninvasive detection of trisomy twenty-one, eighteen, and thirteen technology allows for a more accurate and safer detection of those conditions than methods available before.

As fetal genome screening became an efficient and widely-used process, scientists researched trisomy twenty-one, eighteen, and thirteen because these trisomies occurred more frequently in comparison to other trisomies. Trisomy twenty-one, known as Down syndrome, is one of the most common birth defects, occurring in twenty two of every ten thousand live births. It can lead to intellectual as well as physical developmental delays. Trisomy eighteen, known as Edwards’ syndrome, is seen in five out of every ten thousand live births. Many developmental defects are associated with Edwards syndrome, including heart and cranial underdevelopment. Trisomy thirteen, known as Patau Syndrome, is seen in two out of every ten thousand live births. An aneuploidy in the thirteenth chromosome has severe developmental consequences such as brain and spinal cord abnormalities, cleft palate, as well as heart and eye defects.

Before scientists found that a pregnant woman’s blood contains cell-free fetal DNA, DNA that is circulating outside of a fetal body cell, physicians conducted diagnostic tests like amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling to analyze fetal genomes. Amniocentesis is a method that collects fetal DNA using a needle to draw amniotic fluid through the pregnant woman’s abdomen. Chorionic villus sampling is a procedure where a specialized catheter is inserted into the abdomen or into the vagina and through the cervix of the pregnant woman to gain access to placental tissue that contains fetal DNA. In both techniques fetal DNA is then isolated from the pregnant woman’s DNA and tested for genetic abnormalities. Both amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling pose significant health risks to both the pregnant woman and the fetus due to the possibility of amniotic fluid leakage and infections that can lead to spontaneous abortion or stillbirth. Lo and Chiu developed an early detection method for fetal DNA, allowing researchers to obtain the same genetic information from fetuses without posing such significant health risks.

In 1997 Lo and his colleagues isolated cell free fetal DNA from a maternal blood sample for the first time at John Radcliffe Hospital at the University of Oxford in Oxford, England. They presented the results in the paper, “Presence of Fetal DNA in Maternal Plasma and Serum,” which showed that fetal DNA could be isolated from blood drawn from the pregnant woman. The research team isolated the fetal DNA from the maternal DNA that circulates normally in the blood, as well as other cells and liquids. They then replicated the fetal DNA that was isolated using a technique called polymerase chain reaction to create copies of the small pieces of fetal DNA to sequence the full genome. The discovery that the entire fetal genome could be accessed without using amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling allowed researchers to avoid putting the pregnant woman and fetus at significant risk for genetic screening.

Lo and his colleagues isolated only fetal DNA with the Y-chromosome, which is male specific, because that allowed them to discern between maternal DNA and fetal DNA. They also looked at the sex of the fetus, which relates to the presence or absence of a Y chromosome.

To address restrictions related to the fact that they could easily detect the fetus’ DNA only if the fetus was a male, Lo and Stephen Chim, a scientist at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China and colleagues searched for other ways to distinguish maternal DNA from fetal DNA. In 2008 the team published a paper titled, “Systemic Search for Placental DNA- Methylation Markers on Chromosome 21: Toward a Maternal Plasma-Based Epigenetic Test for Fetal Trisomy.” In their paper the authors described a new method to distinguish fetal DNA from maternal DNA based on a pattern in fetal placental red blood cells that was different from adult maternal DNA. The team identified a gene on chromosome twenty-one called SERPINB5 in fetal DNA that had fewer carbon and hydrogen molecules attached compared to the adult DNA in which the gene had many carbon and hydrogen molecules. The difference in number of carbon and hydrogen molecules on the gene allowed geneticists to separate fetal DNA from maternal DNA without looking for the presence of the Y chromosome, which previously did not allow for female fetus DNA to be isolated. That pattern of carbons and hydrogen attached to the DNA molecules also allowed geneticists to differentiate between maternal and fetal DNA without looking for a specific sex trait in the fetal DNA that the pregnant woman did not carry. Researchers then looked at larger gene issues, such aneuploidies, rather than only single gene issues.

Chim and colleagues continued to research the difference in DNA to identify pieces on chromosome twenty-one that had the highest difference in methylation between the fetal and maternal DNA. They identified the two areas on the chromosome that had the biggest difference in methylation and created two markers. Each marker allowed scientists to detect fetal DNA from maternal plasma. Those markers allowed researchers to find fetal DNA even when mixed with maternal DNA in the pregnant woman’s blood. Researchers used markers as a new method for fetal DNA identification to identify genetic abnormalities.

Geneticists replicated the fetal DNA after isolating it from the maternal blood to produce enough quantity to test. They used an amplification technique called polymerase chain reaction or PCR, which consists of a sequence of steps heating and cooling DNA with other enzymes to replicate the original DNA sample many times over. The PCR technique of amplifying fetal DNA increased the rate of detection of the trisomies. However, the PCR technique contributed to an issue of false positives in the genetic tests.

Researchers continued to study fetal DNA detection methods to address the issues with PCR in its applicability to fetal genomic testing. In 2002 Bernhard Zimmerman, an obstetrician from Switzerland, and his team analyzed fetal DNA to identify trisomy using a comparative analysis technique. The researchers used the relative amounts of chromosomes to identify when too many chromosomes were present in the genome. For aneuploidies, fetal samples with three chromosomes measured higher than the normal level of fetal chromosomes of just two. Such a technique is called relative chromosome dosage analysis or RCD and it allows researchers to measure a difference in the amount of chromosomes in fetal samples with trisomy twenty-one. Zimmerman and his team also created and used a new type of digital PCR that sped up the process to make it more efficient.

The opportunity to analyze the extracted fetal DNA in a faster and more efficient way led to further research into the different applications of the new technology. In 2007 Lo and a team of researchers used Zimmerman’s digital PCR technique to detect trisomy 21 for the first time. They published the results of that research in “Digital PCR for the Molecular Detection of Fetal Chromosomal Aneuploidy,” which showed two things using the digital PCR method. First, they reestablished Zimmerman and team’s research that a reliable diagnosis of trisomy twenty-one can be assessed from a technique that identifies an abnormality in the ratio of alleles. Second, they found that analyzing the overrepresentation, or over dosage, of a particular gene can lead to an aneuploidy diagnosis. Therefore, if there is one gene of interest on the chromosome, a signal for two of those genes is normal and a signal for three means the fetus has a trisomy. Lo and colleagues advanced fetal genetic screening by making it more efficient through digitalized PCR and using gene ratio information to diagnose trisomies.

As fetal DNA isolation from maternal serum became a popular research topic in obstetrics, scientists researched how to make general genome sequencing more efficient as well. Next Generation Sequencing or NGC, also known as massively parallel sequencing, lowers the cost of genome sequencing and also reveals more information about the genome. The process amplifies the sample DNA quickly to create a significant amount of DNA to test and analyze. Also, rather than analyzing individual genomes to identify possible genetic abnormalities, NGC compares the test genomes to a large database of references to identify irregularities that are more significant than the normal differences seen between individuals. The change in the amplification as well as the analysis technique have made NGC a much more efficient process than original DNA sequencing and analysis, which has reduced cost and made genetic testing more available to the general public.

Noninvasive fetal diagnostic techniques have evolved from that the early work of Lo and his team to become efficient and tools of testing a mother’s blood for information about the fetus’ genome. High-risk fetal DNA collection techniques like amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling are becoming less common methods to detect for genetic abnormalities, reducing the risk for pregnant women and their fetuses.

Sources

  1. Chim, Stephen SC, Shengnan Jin, Tracy YH Lee, Fiona MF Lun, Wing S. Lee, Lisa YS Chan, Yongjie Jin. "Systematic search for placental DNA-methylation markers on chromosome 21: toward a maternal plasma-based epigenetic test for fetal trisomy 21." Clinical Chemistry 54.3 (2008): 500-511. http://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18202156 (Accessed May 15, 2016).
  2. Evans, Mark I., David A. Wright, Eugene Pergament, Howard S. Cuckle, and Kypros H. Nicolaides. "Digital PCR for noninvasive detection of aneuploidy: power analysis equations for feasibility." Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy 31.4 (2012): 244-7. http://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22538702 (Accessed May 15, 2016).
  3. Fan, H. Christina, Wei Gu, Jianbin Wang, Yair J. Blumenfeld, Yasser Y. El-Sayed, and Stephen R. Quake. "Non-invasive prenatal measurement of the fetal genome." Nature 487.7407 (2012): 320-324. http ://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3561905/ (Accessed May 15, 2016).
  4. Loane, Maria, Joan K Morris, Marie-Claude Addor, Larraitz Arriola, Judith Budd, Berenice Doray, Ester Garne, Miriam Gatt, Martin Haeusler, Babak Khoshnood, Kari Klungsøyr Melve, Anna Latos-Bielenska, Bob McDonnell, Carmel Mullaney, Mary O'Mahony, Annette Queißer-Wahrendorf, Judith Rankin, Anke Rissmann, Catherine Rounding, Joaquin Salvador, David Tucker, Diana Wellesley, Lyubov Yevtushok and Helen Dolk. "Twenty-year trends in the prevalence of Down syndrome and other trisomies in Europe: impact of maternal age and prenatal screening." European Journal of Human Genetics 21.1 (2013): 27-33. http ://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3522199/ (Accessed May 15, 2016).
  5. Lo, Y.M. Dennis, Fiona Lun, K.C. Allen Chan, Nancy Tsui, Ka C Chong, Tze K. Lau, Tak Leung, Benny Zee, Charles Cantor, and Rossa Chiu. "Digital PCR for the molecular detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104.32 (2007): 13116-13121. http ://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1934923/ (Accessed May 15, 2016).
  6. Lo, Y.M. Dennis, and Rossa W.K. Chiu. "Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of fetal chromosomal aneuploidies by maternal plasma nucleic acid analysis." Clinical Chemistry 54.3 (2008): 461-466. http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid= 18202154 (Accessed May 15, 2016).
  7. Lo, Y. “Noninvasive prenatal detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidies by maternal plasma nucleic acid analysis: a review of the current state of the art.” British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 116 (2009): 152–157. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j. 1471-0528.2008.02010.x/full (Accessed May 15, 2016).
  8. Norton, Mary E., Herb Brar, Jonathan Weiss, Ardeshir Karimi, Louise C. Laurent, Aaron B. Caughey, M. Hellen Rodriguez, John Williams III, Michael E. Mitchell, Charles D. Adair Hanmin Lee, Bo Jacobsson, Mark W. Tomlinson, Dick Oepkes, Desiree Hollemon, Andrew B. Sparks, Arnold Oliphant, and Ken Song. "Non-Invasive Chromosomal Evaluation (NICE) Study: results of a multicenter prospective cohort study for detection of fetal trisomy 21 and trisomy 18." American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 207.2 (2012): 137-e1. http://www.ajog.org/article/S0002-9378(12)00584-4/fulltext (Accessed May 15, 2016).
  9. Porreco, Richard P., Thomas Garite, Kimberly Maurel, Barbara Marusiak, Mathias Ehrich, Dirk van den Boom, Cosmin Deciu, and Allan Bombard. "Noninvasive prenatal screening for fetal trisomies 21, 18, 13 and the common sex chromosome aneuploidies from maternal blood using massively parallel genomic sequencing of DNA." American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 211.4 (2014): 365-e1. http://www.ajog.org/article/S0002-9378(14)00270-1/fulltext (Accessed May 15, 2016).
  10. Reis-Filho, Jorge S. "Next-generation sequencing." Breast Cancer Research 11 Suppl 3 (2009): S12. http ://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2797692/ (Accessed May 15, 2016).
  11. Shea, Jennifer L., Eleftherios Diamandis, Barry Hoffman, Y.M. Dennis Lo, Jacob Canick, and Dirk van den Boom. "A new era in prenatal diagnosis: the use of cell-free fetal DNA in maternal circulation for detection of chromosomal aneuploidies." Clinical Chemistry 59.8 (2013): 1151-1159. http://www .clinchem.org/content/59/8/1151.full (Accessed May 15, 2016).
  12. The MaterniT21 Plus Prenatal Test. "The MaterniT21 PLUS Prenatal Test - Expansive Answers from a Simple Blood Test."Sequenom Laboratories. https://laboratories.sequenom.com/patients/maternit21-plus/ (Accessed March 11, 2016).
  13. Zimmermann, Bernhard, Wolfgang Holzgreve, Friedel Wenzel, and Sinuhe Hahn. "Novel real-time quantitative PCR test for trisomy 21." Clinical Chemistry 48.2 (2002): 362-363. http://www. clinchem.org/content/48/2/362.full (Accessed May 15, 2016).

How to cite

Possehl, Cassidy, "Noninvasive Fetal Aneuploidy Detection for Trisomy 21, 13, and 18". Embryo Project Encyclopedia (2017-04-06). ISSN: 1940-5030 http://embryo.asu.edu/handle/10776/11468.

Show full item record

Publisher

Arizona State University. School of Life Sciences. Center for Biology and Society. Embryo Project Encyclopedia.

Rights

Copyright Arizona Board of Regents Licensed as Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/

Last modified

Sunday, May 7, 2017 - 22:28

Topic

Science

Subject

Polymerase Chain Reaction; Trisomy 18; Trisomy 13 syndrome; Down syndrome; Aneuploidy; Lo, Y. M. Dennis; Cleft palate; Chiu, Rossa W. K.; Amniocentesis; Chorionic villus sampling; New Hyde Park (N.Y.); University College (University of Oxford); John Radcliffe Hospital; Technology