Johann Friedrich Blumenbach (1752-1840)

By Kate MacCord
Published: 2014-01-22
Keywords: Bildungstrieb
Johann Friedrich Blumenbach (1752-1840)

In eighteenth century Germany, Johann Friedrich Blumenbach studied how individuals within a species vary, and to explain such variations, he proposed that a force operates on organisms as they develop. Blumenbach used metrical methods to study the history of humans, but he was also a natural historian and theorist. Blumenbach argued for theories of the transformation of species, or the claim that new species can develop from existing forms. His theory of Bildungstrieb (formative drive), a developmental force within all organisms, influenced the conceptual debates among many late nineteenth and early twentieth century embryologists and naturalists.

Blumenbach was born 11 May 1752 in Gotha, Germany. His mother, Charlotte Eleonore Hedwig Buddeus, was the daughter of a high-ranking official in Gotha's government. Blumenbach's father, Heinrich Blumenbach, was the assistant headmaster at the local gymnasium, or primary school. Blumenbach completed his early education in Gotha, graduating from the gymnasium in 1769. After graduation, he attended the University of Jena, in Jena, Germany, before moving to the University of Göttingen, in Göttingen, Germany. While a student at the University of Göttingen, Blumenbach studied with naturalist Christian W. Büttner. Büttner taught Blumenbach via his lectures on exotic cultures and peoples, and he encouraged Blumenbach to write his dissertation on such communities.

In 1775 Blumenbach received his medical degree from the University of Göttingen after completing his dissertation, "De Generis Humani Varietate Native Liber" ("On the Natural Varieties of Mankind"). This text showed that the variations that exist in the human form do not represent differences between human species. In his dissertation, he also introduced the term Caucasian as a term for white Europeans. Blumenbach's dissertation is an early demonstration of comparative anatomy to objectively study human history. While earlier scholars, like Georges-Louis Leclerc, Comte de Buffon, in France, had created classifications of humans, they based their works largely on subjective behavioral characteristics and cultural biases. Blumenbach argued that there are five distinct races of mankind within a single species, a conclusion he derived from detailed studies of skulls and human anatomy. Although Blumenbach recognized distinct races, he also believed in the unity of the human species, and he combated the use of anthropology as a means to promote discrimination.

Following the publication of his dissertation, Blumenbach became curator of the natural history collection at the University of Göttingen. In 1778 he became a professor of medicine and married the daughter of an administrator at the university. The following year, Blumenbach published Handbuch der Naturgeschichte (Handbook of Natural History), in which he evaluated morphological and ecological evidence from which he created a system to classify organisms. Blumenbach believed that the Linnaean system of classification, developed by Carl Linnaeus in the 1735 text Systema Naturae, published while Linnaeus was in the Netherlands, defined species on the basis of single, often arbitrarily chosen, characteristics, a practice that many thought produced artificial groups that did not accurately reflect nature. Blumenbach hoped to correct these supposed problems with the Linnaean system by defining species based on a series of morphological characters, which he presented in his Handbuch. He also recognized the potential for species to change through time or to become extinct. Blumenbach later expanded on those topics in his Beiträge zur Naturgeschichte (Contributions to Natural History), in which he further investigated individual variability and the possibility that the Earth had a long history.

In 1780 Blumenbach presented his concept of Bildungstrieb, or the formative force, an idea that influenced many in an embryological debate of his time and that affected developmental research and natural philosophy for more than a century. In his paper, "Über den Bildungstrieb (Nisus Formativus) und Seinen Einfluss auf die Generation und Reproduktion" ("On the Formative Force and its Influence on Generation and Reproduction") Blumenbach described Bildungstrieb as a force within all organisms that operated on their bodies throughout development in order to give rise to their final forms.

Blumenbach's Bildungstrieb concept influenced the debate between preformationists and epigenesists, as it attacked the assumptions underlying preformationism. According to preformationism, an organism existed fully formed within the egg or sperm (germ cell), and the process of development was one of the animal unfolding, or growing, from its miniature germinal form to more mature and adult forms. Many scholars, such as Albrecht von Haller, in Switzerland, Marcello Malpighi, in Italy, and Jan Swammerdam, in the Netherlands, believed that some form of preformationism best explained development. On the other hand, according to epigenesis, each embryo generated anew by gradually developing from unorganized materials, a theory supported by the Caspar Friedrich Wolff, in Russia. Previous authors, such as Wolff, had offered notions similar to Bildungstrieb, of vital forces that shaped the body. However, Blumenbach's concept went beyond those offered by other scholars, as it reinforced the arguments for epigenesis. He provided a framework for understanding a force for development that was both teleological, in that it acted towards a final form, and constitutive, in that it could organize development.

Blumenbach applied his Bildungstrieb concept in his following works and various scholars utilized his concept. In the second edition of On the Natural Varieties of Mankind, Blumenbach used Bildungstrieb to explain the degeneration of an original type of human into the five varieties—which he later classified as Caucasian, Mongolian, Malayan, Ethiopian, and American—found around the world. In Contributions to Natural History, published in 1790, Blumenbach described how Bildungstrieb operated after the Biblical flood to produce new species. The concept was adopted by the writer and natural philosopher Johann Wolfgang von Goethe in Germany, and the philosopher Immanuel Kant in Prussia. Nearly one hundred years after Blumenbach's formulation of the concept, Ernst Haeckel, the chair of zoology at the University of Jena, employed Bildungstrieb as the foundation of his theories on individual development—theories which influenced embryological research well into the twentieth century.

Blumenbach participated in more than seventy academies and scientific organizations, and he continued to teach at the University of Göttingen during his later years. His textbook, Handbuch der Vergleichenden Anatomie (Handbook of Comparative Anatomy), published in 1805, influenced many throughout the history of comparative anatomy. In 1816 Blumenbach earned the appointment professor primarius of the Faculty of Medicine. Throughout his tenure at Göttingen, Blumenbach taught many students, such as the naturalist Alexander von Humboldt, and the early proponent of recapitulation theory, Carl Friedrich Kielmeyer. An active naturalist throughout life, Blumenbach was among the first to describe the wooly mammoth, Mammuthus primigenius, and he helped name the platypus, Ornithorhynchus anatinus. He helped turn the natural history collection at the University of Göttingen into one of the first anthropological museums in the world, as he amassed and catalogued skulls, hair, skins, casts, and pictures from places around the world. When Blumenbach was appointed curator in 1776, the collection housed 85 skulls; when he died on 22 January 1840, the collection had grown to 245 skulls with detailed accounts of their origin. Blumenbach's skull collection, including the skulls that formed the basis of his dissertation and his theory of the five varieties of human, persisted at the University of Göttingen into the twenty-first century.


  1. Barber, Kenneth. "Johann Friedrich Blumenbach." In Science and Its Times, eds. Neil Schlager and Josh Lauer, 151–2. Detroit: Gale, 2000.
  2. Barber, Kenneth. "Johann Blumenbach and the Classification of Human Races." In Science and Its Times, eds. Neil Schlager and Josh Lauer, 105–8. Detroit: Gale, 2000.
  3. Baron, Walter. "Blumenbach, Johann Friedrich." Complete Dictionary of Scientific Biography. 2 (2008): 203–05.
  4. Blumenbach, Johann Friedrich. "De Generis Humani Varietate Native Liber" [On the Natural Varieties of Mankind], 1775. In The Anthropological Treatises of Johann Friedrich Blumenbach and the Inaugural Dissertation of John Hunter, ed. and trans. Thomas Bendyshe, 65–144. London: Logman, Green, Longman, Robers, & Green, 1865. (Accessed October 3, 2012).
  5. Blumenbach, Johann Friedrich. Handbuch der Naturgeschichte [Handbook of Natural History]. Göttingen: Johann Christian Dieterich, 1779. (Accessed October 3, 2012).
  6. Blumenbach, Johann Friedrich. "Über den Bildungstrieb (Nisus formativus) und seinen Einfluss auf die Generation und Reproduktion" [On the Formative Force and its Influence on Generation and Reproduction]. Göttingisches Magazin der Wissenschaften und Literatur 1 (1780): 247–66. (Accessed January 14, 2014).
  7. Blumenbach, Johann Friedrich. "Beiträge zur Naturgeschichte" [Contributions to Natural History], 1790. In The Anthropological Treatises of Johann Friedrich Blumenbach and the Inaugural Dissertation of John Hunter, ed. and trans. Thomas Bendyshe, 277–340. London: Logman, Green, Longman, Robers, & Green, 1865. (Accessed October 3, 2012).
  8. Blumenbach, Johann Friedrich. Handbuch der Vergleichenden Anatomie [Handbook of Comparative Anatomy]. Göttingen: H. Dieterich, 1805. (Accessed January 14, 2014).
  9. Buffon, Georges Louis Leclerc, comte de. Histoire Naturelle Générale et Particulière [Natural History, General and Particular]. Paris: de l'imprimerie Royale, 1804. (Accessed October 22, 2012)
  10. Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von. Gedichte. Leipzig: J.G. Cotta, 1868. (Accessed January 14, 2014).
  11. Haeckel, Ernst. "Die Gastraea-Theorie, die phylogenetische Classification des Thierreichs und die Homologie der Keimblatter" [The Gastraea Theory, the Phylogenetic Classification of the Animal Kingdom and the Homology of the Germ Layers]. In Jenaische Zeitschrift fur Naturwissenschaft, 8 (1874): 1–55. (Accessed November 30, 2013).
  12. Hall, Brian Keith. "The Paradoxical Platypus." BioScience 49 (1999): 211–18.
  13. von Haller, Albrecht. Elementa physiologiae corporis humani [Elements of Human Physiology]. Lausanne: Sumptibus M.M. Bousquet et Sociurum, 1757.
  14. Humboldt, Alexander von. Ansichten der Natur, mit wissenschaftlichen Erläuterungen [Aspects of Nature, in Different Lands and Different Climates]. Stuttgart: J.G. Cotta, 1849. (Accessed January 14, 2014). Translated by M. Sabine as Aspects of Nature. London: Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans, 1849. (Accessed January 14, 2014).
  15. Kant, Immanuel. Kritik der Urteilskraft [Critique of The Power of Judgement]. Berlin: Legard and Friedrich, 1790. (Accessed January 14, 2013). Translated by J.H. Bernard as Kant's Critique of Judgement. London: St. Martins, 1914. (Accessed January 14, 2014).
  16. Keith, Arthur. "Blumenbach's Centenary." Man 40 (1940): 82–85.
  17. Kielmeyer, Carl Friedrich. Ueber die Verhältnisse der organischen Kräfte untereinander in der Reihe der verschiedenen Organisationen, die Gesetze und Folgen dieser Verhältnisse [On the Relations of the Organic Forces in the Series of the Different Organizations, the Laws and Consequences of these Conditions]. Stuttgart: Academischen Buchdrukerei, 1793.
  18. Lenoir, Timothy. "Kant, Blumenbach, and Vital Materialism in German Biology." Isis 71 (1980) 77–108.
  19. Linnaeus, Carl. Systema Naturae [System of Nature], 12th edition. Holmiae: Laurentii Salvii, 1766–68. (Accessed January 14, 2014).
  20. Malpighi, Marcello. Dissertatio Epistolica de Formatione Pulli in Ovo [On the Formation of the Chick in the Egg]. London: J Martyn, 1673. (Accessed January 14, 2014).
  21. Oppenheimer, Jane. "Ernst Haeckel as an Intermediary in the Transmutation of an Idea." Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 126 (1982): 347–55.
  22. Richards, Robert. "Kant and Blumenbach on the Bildungstrieb: A Historical Misunderstanding." Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biology and Biomedical Sciences 31 (2000): 11–32.
  23. Roe, Shirley. Matter, Life, and Generation: 18th-Century Embryology and the Haller-Wolff Debate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.
  24. Swammerdam, Jan. Miraculum naturae sive uteri muliebris fabrica [A miracle of nature or the structure of the female uterus]. Leiden: Severinum Matthaei, 1672. (Accessed January 14, 2014).
  25. Wolff, Caspar Friedrich. Theoria Generationis [Generation Theory]. Halle: Hendelianis, 1759. (Accessed January 14, 2014).

How to cite

MacCord, Kate, "Johann Friedrich Blumenbach (1752-1840)". Embryo Project Encyclopedia (2014-01-22). ISSN: 1940-5030

Show full item record


Arizona State University. School of Life Sciences. Center for Biology and Society. Embryo Project Encyclopedia.


Copyright Arizona Board of Regents Licensed as Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

Last modified

Tuesday, December 16, 2014 - 23:38




Anatomy; Anthropology; Anatomy, Comparative; Blumenbach, Johann Friedrich, 1752-1840; Variation (Biology); Embryos; Developmental biology; Embryology; Human anatomy; Natural history; Epigenesis; Human anatomy--Variation; People