A. Z. v. B. Z. (2000)

A. Z. v. B. Z. (2000)

In A.Z. v. B.Z. (2000), the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts in Boston, Massachusetts, affirmed a lower court’s decision, ruling that contracts that require a party to become a parent against his or her will are unenforceable and contrary to public policy. The case centered around A.Z.

In re Marriage of Witten (2003)

<a href="/search?text=In%20re%20Marriage%20of%20Witten%20%282003%29" title="" class="lexicon-term">In re Marriage of Witten (2003)</a>

In re Marriage of Witten, decided by the Iowa Supreme Court in 2003, held that neither Tamera nor Arthur (Trip) Witten could use or destroy several cryopreserved preembryos created during their marriage using in vitro

Davis v. Davis (1992)

<a href="/search?text=Davis%20v.%20Davis%20%281992%29" title="" class="lexicon-term">Davis v. Davis (1992)</a>

In Davis v. Davis (1992), the Supreme Court of Tennessee decided a dispute over cryopreserved preembryos in favor of Junior Lewis Davis, who sought to have the preembryos destroyed over the objections of his former wife, Mary Sue Davis. The decision in Davis, although not binding in other states, suggested a framework for resolving similar disputes in the US.

York v. Jones (1989)

<a href="/search?text=York%20v.%20Jones%20%281989%29" title="" class="lexicon-term">York v. Jones (1989)</a>

In the case York v. Jones (1989), the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia was one of the first US courts to address a dispute about a cryopreserved preembryo.

The Cabinet of Frederik Ruysch

The Cabinet of <a href="/search?text=Frederik%20Ruysch" title="" class="lexicon-term">Frederik Ruysch</a>

Frederik Ruysch’s cabinet of curiosities, commonly referred to simply as the Cabinet, was a museum Ruysch created in the Netherlands in the late 1600s. The Cabinet filled a series of small houses that Ruysch rented in Amsterdam, and they contained greater than 2,000 specimens, including preserved fetuses and infants.

Subscribe to RSS - Embryo